August 4 th 2024
Written by Deepraj
Complete access to the system, including source code, architecture, and configuration details.
No prior knowledge or access to the system; testers simulate an external attacker
Deep and thorough assessments, allowing for comprehensive vulnerability identification
Limited depth; may overlook internal vulnerabilities due to lack of information.
Evaluates internal vulnerabilities, code quality, security misconfigurations, and business logic flaws.
Primarily assesses external vulnerabilities and attack vectors that a real-world hacker would exploit.
Maximizes testing time by targeting specific areas based on available information.
May require more time for reconnaissance and information gathering before actual testing begins.
Includes both static and dynamic analysis of applications and infrastructure.
Relies on behavioral testing, focusing on inputs and outputs without internal insights.
Generally lower costs due to reduced reconnaissance time and focused testing efforts.
Typically higher costs due to the extensive time needed for reconnaissance and potential for incomplete assessments.
Can leverage automated tools for code analysis and testing
Primarily relies on manual testing and external tools for vulnerability scanning.
More complex due to the need for understanding internal code and architecture.
More complex due to the need for understanding internal code and architecture.
Aims to identify vulnerabilities early in the development lifecycle.
Seeks to evaluate the system's security from an external perspective, mimicking an actual attack.
Generally faster in identifying vulnerabilities due to prior knowledge.
May take longer as the tester must explore and discover vulnerabilities without guidance
Choose our penetration testing services for expert security solutions. Protect your business today!